Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Why Did I Get Married Too? | D

Tyler Perry

Staff Writer

Published: Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Updated: Monday, April 26, 2010 22:04

Why Did I Get Married Too?

Why Did I Get Married Too?

Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married Too? is a sequel, but you don't need to have watched 2007's Why Did I Get Married? to understand what's going on. In fact, you barely need to watch this one to understand what's going on. In accordance with his usual style, Perry spells things out very clearly: All you have to do is picture about a month's worth of daytime soap opera episodes crammed into two hours.
The film is pretty much split into two halves. The first half is when Perry, the writer/director, tries his best to be slightly comedic during the four couple's annual vacation retreat, this time to the Bahamas. While Perry may be lauded for his stage work, his film writing is sloppy and confusing. Every gag or joke that happens seems to be a real reach for the audience to laugh at, sometimes even making comedic moments awkward.
The second half, when everyone's back in Atlanta, is when we get to the melodrama. This one thinks that one is cheating on him! This one is certain that one is cheating on her! These two are splitting up! This one is insecure about not being able to find a job, and irritated that his wife's ex-husband keeps hanging around! Here's some cancer! Here's some alcoholism! Would you care for a smattering of domestic violence? Don't mind if I do!
There's nothing inherently wrong with any of those story lines, of course. But Perry handles everything so amateurishly, with on-the-nose dialogue and a complete lack of subtlety or nuance. I marvel at the sheer lunacy of the scene where a drunk Malik Yoba harasses a weeping Janet Jackson in the midst of their messy divorce, pours vodka on her and then sets fire to the photo album containing the only remaining pictures of their dead child. In fact, someone should compile all of their scenes, because their entire story line is off-the-rails insane — and slightly disturbing — considering that Jackson was dealing with the death of her brother Michael during the time of filming.
Perry's direction of a scene also takes away from the film as a whole. During every argument or climatic scene for each of the four couples dealing with their own problems, there's always another character in the background or an extra standing in the back, completely not reacting the right way to the seriousness of the scene, causing the audience to laugh or just completely lose track of what is actually going on.
Most of the drama is so tame and derivative that Perry seems to be going through the motions on this one, repeating the platitudes and relationship angst that he's trotted out a half-dozen times already. How he built an empire off of sub-par films like this one is a mystery that Hollywood will continue to wonder about for years to come.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

Anonymous
Sun Apr 18 2010 09:23
I mean the movie is filled with drama but i must say I'm disappointed in the way it ended. It's like pat is almost rewarded for all the nonsense she was going on with and put gavin through by meeting that guy in the end. And what she did at his job was ridiculous. That seemed really unrealistic to me. the plot was kinda confusing and it didn't help by the movie ending so abruptly.
Anonymous
Sat Apr 17 2010 15:04
tperrys movies screams help. perry lacks substance. he is a manager, but not a good one. he needs to hire professional writers and directors. keep the actors, they are great with the exception of janet jackson. all of that crying with that greasy curl was not convincing. the abuse of her furniture after she screams about her book deal. kind of inconsistent. the general plots and statements are not followed with detail. in addition, tperry is good at playing madea and that's it. his acting ability is something to be desired. in the industry, everyone is careful to not criticize him because he is successful at the box office. i want to wish him the best. perry, go get those great writers out of yale, emory, brown, usc, howard, vassar and hampton (just to name a few universities). also, hire a consultant. kill your ego tyler. your intentions are good and you are applauded for your efforts, but your movies are way too predictable and we desire and yearn for more.
Chandra Hazelwood,WI
Fri Apr 16 2010 17:51
I have read critics comments about Tyler Perry and not one has had a good thing to say. What do you want from him? Hollywood hates that Tyler movies are #1 and we know they are number 1.
Even the theaters out......Clash of the Titians had 3100 theaters through out, Tyler had 2000 or so....... Hollywood has to be scared to death that this man has came to the top and it bother the critics too. What are critics? Lost writers that say terrible things about people they wish they were, really, who are they?
Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 09:08
The storyline I was unsure of was Patrica & Gavin. Had communication gotton so bad between the couple, that they just existed. Was Gavin so desperate for a relationship that pushing Pat to the edgewas a way he frlt might make her open up? Was having half of her book proceeds a way of getting back at her or a means of stepping into a part of her world that he didn't feel she allowed him in? How did Pat feel she had made financial provision for Gavin's firm? And what with the ending, Pat has completely recovered (in a year) from the the death of her son and husband?
muffi-puff
Thu Apr 15 2010 12:39
this is a really good movie soo go watch please the actors desere the money
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 01:26
I must say that while I am a fan of Tyler Perry, this movie was a disappointment. The characters and storyline were very poorly developed. I can only imagine that it must have been a rushed effort. The actors are a talented bunch, but there was not much they could do with such obvious poor writing and directing. I'm willing to give Mr. Perry a pass based upon his work in the past, but I hope that he assembles a talented writing staff and takes some directing ques from other gifted directors to improve his craft.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 22:26
umm yeah to the person above, why don't you just go see it and then talk? I think that if you have this much time to read a full-length critique and write an unsubstantiated comment on it, you need a life badly!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 22:08
Stop hating! His movie cant be bad i personally have not seen it yet but everyone that has told me it is very very good! i think if u have this much time to critique a movie to that extent u need a life badly!






log out